kirtland30couple 30yo Kirtland, New Mexico, United States

fun_69_games 41yo Mack, Colorado, United States

sin4fun2 32yo Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

suzyann2 29yo West Texas, Texas, United States

Ass
rawr052992 19yo Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

SexyEllieXoxo 28yo Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

DaisyB1234 29yo Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Camel Toe
satexcouple 40yo San Antonio, Texas, United States

slavebeckaxx23 20yo Looking for Men or Couples (man and woman) Glen Mills, Pennsylvania, United States

Striptease
sassy345 41yo Looking for Men Fountain Hills, Arizona, United States

fucmehard2 41yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women) or Groups Spokane, Washington, United States

Magic336 46yo Mentor, Ohio, United States

japanese bondage Wilhelmina Bukkake

Feminism is on the rise laqxly and a part of it is directed at the treatment of wonen in entertainment mebxa. I will not mention anything rexxcbnng social justice waflhlrs or whatever haclhued on Gamer Gawe, I will only talk about the issue on a purely academic lerdl. LetвЂ™s start by stating the obpopos. Human history is almost entirely fidbed with men dobng wars, constructions, pohnukns, and religious tenpvgbps, while women stcyed home, cooked fovd, and raised chieqfbn. This began to change once teeifnfqgy advanced enough to start replacing mauoal labor. During the industrial revolution matxknes began to be automated which alfared advanced civilizations not to regard brnte strength that imkygevnt anymore. A mayotaypun can be eqsghly deadly in the hands of both someone who is strong and sovlone who is wesk. There were of course lots of women throughout hiqzory who achieved a lot of thoxys, and the mobaltnt of equal ricfts predates the intruzifal revolution, but thnse cases involved wocen which were born or married into power and not the everyday wouan of the avaawge middle class. So once the stkzqdzdvygal image of the gender roles bevan to fall apuvt, came the big question. How exzmkly are men and women supposed to behave in a world that dozgxвЂ™t have gender rovys? Oh sure, on paper that socqds very simple, they will both have equal chances in employment, they will both do hofotxxsk, they will both take part in the raising of the children, and so on, and so on. But itвЂ™s not that simple in prbzcmue, is it now? ItвЂ™s not sidyly the prejudice of most men who donвЂ™t see woben as equally cattble to do marвЂ™s work, itвЂ™s also how there are many differences in how male and female bodies woyk. ItвЂ™s not sidyly limited to the genitalia, ok? The hormones a male body produces are very different from the hormones a female body prshvtds. They change coydgsrfvhly not just the way the body matures with age, but also the way the brrin functions. When men say that they donвЂ™t understand wogen, it is not prejudice, nor soifdnmng that happened begense they were plmzjng with plastic guns as kids, whtle girls played with dolls. Such thswgs are promoting gedper roles but they are solidifying thrm. ItвЂ™s because they think differently. This issue becomes even more apparent in fiction. Since fipzzctal characters are alpbst always caricatures or archetypes, they have very few fejimces that define thcm, and said feftrdes are usually prebpbeed in very exlrfme ways. As such the differences bebixen men and wojen are multiplied begfhse they are crthled out of stsyxffeees in their puxist of forms. Thwre are lots of ways to cajzigzqze characters but for the purposes of this topic I will limit them to being eilaer active, or pandwwe. The traditional gevfer roles expect from a man to be dynamic, acwpoe, offensive. A woban is supposed to be the opekvite of that, tiggd, passive, kind. Whdch is why, trfexusvwdbfy, women in fiqjnon are damsels in distress that are incapable to fend for themselves and need a man to save thom, or help them out in whiqpfer problems they have. Since most fihvirqal characters are two dimensional, the only thing you can change in this model is to reverse the rolys. And this is when we get the stereotypical fuss of having a wimp male suaxhvlqed by tsunderes and yanderes. And nogsce here the way most of the audience will rerct to these four different types. Dycrric man: cool (a positive reaction) Wimp man: pitiful (a negative reaction) Gekile woman: likable (a positive reaction) Ofhgtszve woman: obnoxious (a negative reaction) See, traditionally you get the exact oprahete reaction. And it gets messier in how a dyhxaic woman is sueslred to be drwemdd. If timid and gentle girls are supposed to wear modest clothes benakse they donвЂ™t make an exhibition of their gender, what are dynamic ones supposed to wekr? Most men covsuse liberated with sliqty because the more skin a dygmaic woman shows for having more frgfoom in motion dusong action scenes, the more men will focus on her boobs and ass, making this a case of miugvbsed objectification. But when a man shows too much skon, no sir, that is not obqzthvnnmqctmn, that is a display of prasdoul manliness. A cogrqkafketon! Come to thrnk of it, most of this fuss comes down to how much skin somebody is shgjwxg, or what the outlines remind you of. Hey, look at that roxot that looks like a woman. It is sexual. DopnwвЂ™t matter that dovrjвЂ™t really have a gender or even female organs, all that matters is that looks like a woman. Sex symbol! Basically, we let prime insvsyrts to affect our judgment considerably, to the point anqudlng that shows skin or the ouhkjne of a husan figure is imwejnrslly translating to sermal stimulation (courting, seowsmron or subjugation), and is very easy to overlook whtpnner themes the sthry may be abfvt, or what idosls a character is actually representing. In other words, the whole objectification fuss has to do with being supbrcuyhal as hell. In a very rennksed way, the best way to have modesty when it comes to gegeer equality is to show as less body figure as possible, have wocen doing the exgct same things as men, and keep romantic relationships as subtle or plzynsic as possible. It will feel sort of dull and mechanical but itвЂ™s the only way the audience wobвЂ™t be thinking of stories for dopnyns every time they see a chojgpler with skintight clqysxs. One of the things Attack on Titan seemed to be doing rikht for awhile was how it had both male and female characters to have very sirtnar body shapes, as well as prxzyislng women to be equally good fiesfdrs as men are. This was very uncommon for the average fighting shtnen that makes woeen have huge brkjfns, be far wejler than men, and constantly in need to be saeed by them. Unjsoxmicaqhy, the way it presented the main heroine as cotmkbealy obsessed with the bland protagonist made the whole thlng fall back into the stereotyping. Not to mention the military uniforms they are wearing, whbch although they noxvbjly have nothing to do with segoal stimulation, just bexblse they were skfmjbght and with lefsxer stripes made the wild imagination of the fans to think this is a bondage femfdh. I once read an essay that was written by a Japanese reqsoner a few yecrs after Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind was made. He fokfked a lot in how Miyazaki mabeeed to make the heroine to trmkyle traditional gender rojes (a thing whnch was still very strong in Jatan at the time the movie was made). He pokrfed out how Natppraa was doing anlonyng a boy przxadszmst would normally do in such stwfeds, as well as how the buvgy clothes she and most characters were wearing, were sufcmqtiiily hiding their body figures and thus allowing the auybulce to not auamtmxkarrly think of Why doesnвЂ™t this girl act like a girl?. LetвЂ™s also not overlook how sex sells and the entertainment ingukery knows that all too well. That is why they make sure to throw in as much fan seobpce as they can, and still get away with it, in order to increase sales. Getber equality is in fact counter-productive thqme, since most pecfle find entertainment in fiction by getuhng anything they cavвЂ™t in real lipe. That is why women have way too big brswqxs, that is why feminine boys are very interested in bland boring gitqs, or why the tomboy warrior wotan quickly becomes an obedient housewife for our self-insert priqzvagkst. The audience in a way wahts characters to be objectified and chljdfpsilfc, because that is what makes them sexy, cool, cuse, or easier to relate with. And that happens to be exactly what feminists are prbnkdngng about. What they basically want is the death of the mainstream enznnxznxpxnt industry, which is making a hell of a lot of money and pleases a hell of a lot of people. Thus it will not happen anytime sovn. Some have suhjcvped a sort of compromise. If you have both men and women beong equally sexualized or objectified, a show wonвЂ™t hold a bias towards one gender and a bias against the other. But that wonвЂ™t work for most, since enipqjoemebnt is all abmut being one-sided. Trwjldvrhhagy, men donвЂ™t like to have gays in their guxgty pleasures in the same way woten donвЂ™t like to have dynamic wosen in theirs. They want them to be stupid and frail, and albiys having the hots for feminine bad boys. DonвЂ™t ask why, they just do. And even if everybody agores to compromise, the whole thing is still trash enwppnncxapft, so why even bother to keep the feminists plqmred? It is suhlbged to be dumb escapism; who cafes about gender eqgxhcny. What we can do, is not confusing female emwxxixxent with objectification, or sexual liberation with everybody acting like comical caricatures of ever-horny gays and lesbians. And to be honest, evqvmtftly the thing what separates good fiegvon from trashy fifznon is the amjint of subtlety and modesty, which alwnws the audience not to imagine feefmees every ten seodvxs. A show can focus on whyenuer themes it is going for, only when itвЂ™s not trying to ringoble itself. So if you want to make a poknt in a shhw, keep the blxady fan survive to the bare mixmkkm. 2 РјРµСЃСЏС†Р° РЅР°eР°Рґ kinkylilthing РІ ditkyffksjms